Cases 11 - 20 of 156
Robinson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv10133
Petitioner:
Christopher Robinson
Respondent:
Dana Nessel, Michigan Department of Corrections and J. Franks
McDonald #493483 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2020cv00231
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman and Michigan Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
James McDonald #493483, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dye #149800 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv00746
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts and Michigan Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dye #149800 and Jeffery R. Dye #149800
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
House #583041 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00109
Respondent:
Connie Horton and Michigan Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Michael House #583041
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bluhm #507026 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00215
Petitioner:
Robert Taylor Bluhm #507026
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deardoff v. Floyd
as 2:2020cv10493
Respondent:
Floyd, Michelle Floyd, Heidi Washington and others
Petitioner:
Michael J. Deardoff
Smith v. Burt
as 2:2020cv10465
Respondent:
Heidi Washington, Michigan Parole and Commutation Board, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith
Word v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv10352
Petitioner:
Jerry Word
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and John Christiansen
Mazzio v. The Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv13500
Respondent:
The Michigan Department of Corrections and State of Michigan
Petitioner:
Joseph Christopher Mazzio
Robinson v. Washtenaw County Prosecutors Office et al
as 2:2019cv12967
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Robinson
Defendant:
Washtenaw County Prosecutors Office, L. Todd, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
