Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Vergara v. U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Respondent:
P. O. Shekevia C. Hawkins, U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA, P. O. Francean Jackson and others
Petitioner:
Hernando Javier Vergara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vergara v. U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA et al
as 1:2021cv02261
Respondent:
P. O. Shekevia C. Hawkins, U. S. Probation Office, N.D.GA and P. O. Francean Jackson
Petitioner:
Hernando Javier Vergara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cohns v. Flowers
as 4:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Chantel P. Flowers
Petitioner:
Gordon D'Andre Cohns
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vargas v. Barr et al
as 1:2021cv00501
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Jesus Corona Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bates v. Barr
as 1:2021cv00119
Petitioner:
Cornelius Jamar Bates
Respondent:
William P. Barr and Monty Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00129
Petitioner:
Lazaro Guzman Castro
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Dan Greenawalt, Thomas P. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lovelace v. Sheriff Victor Hill
as 1:2020cv02552
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BENNETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 7:2020cv00107
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID PAULK
Petitioner:
HENRY P BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wimbush v. Tatum
as 1:2020cv02376
Respondent:
Murray Tatum, Timothy C. Ward and Brian P. Kemp
Petitioner:
Therian Wimbush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Kemp et al
as 1:2020cv00408
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp, Timothy C. Ward and Reagan Blackhead
Plaintiff:
Charles Myron Taylor, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
