Cases 11 - 20 of 268
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01545
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers and NFN Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez
Respondent:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez, Jr. v. USA
as 4:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00692
Petitioner:
Roy Castaneda Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobbie Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
James Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00088
Petitioner:
Willie Rodriguez Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Luis Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv02931
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, NFN Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
