Cases 11 - 20 of 651
Drew Witzig v. David Shinn
as 23-15536
Petitioner / Appellant:
DREW MICHAEL WITZIG
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Danny Morris v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15573
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY RAY MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Ramos v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Petitioner:
Adam Ramos and Adam Bustos Ramos
Respondent:
David Shinn, Mark Brnovich, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Younan v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15800
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEWART EDWARD YOUNAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Phillip Speers v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15533
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP GREGORY SPEERS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry for the State of Arizona and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Arizona
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Rafael Pulido Quiroz v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15735
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL PULIDO QUIROZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jones v. Shinn
as 2:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
Dennis Jones
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade Limehouse v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15390
Petitioner / Appellant:
WADE AARON LIMEHOUSE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
William Stedcke v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15703
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. STEDCKE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
