Cases 11 - 20 of 264
Knock v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Craig William Knock
Respondent:
Teri Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Vertis R McCoy
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones-Williams v. St. Louis County Justice Center
as 4:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Respondent:
St. Louis County Justice Center and Sam Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kirk et al v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Carl Kirk, Daniel Bohannan, Steven Whitt and others
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flaugher v. State of Missouri
as 4:2022cv00827
Petitioner:
Douglas William Flaugher
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03297
Petitioner:
Joshua William Jackson
Respondent:
Jeff Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01184
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
David Vandergriff and Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01155
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hacker
as 4:2022cv00658
Petitioner:
Rodney Vashon Williams
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Redington
as 2:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
William J. Jones
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
