Cases 11 - 20 of 331
Flemming v. Peeple
as 5:2023cv04034
Petitioner:
William Tyrel Flemming
Respondent:
Warden Peeple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Joseph
as 1:2023cv04009
Petitioner:
Maurice L. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Martell
as 4:2023cv01833
Petitioner:
Malcolm Antwon Williams and Malcolm A. Williams
Respondent:
Wilfredo Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brockmeyer v. Stirling et al
as 1:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
William Mark Brockmeyer
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Asar v. Williams
as 6:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Difankh Asar and James Michael Gist
Respondent:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. State of South Carolina,
as 2:2023cv01290
Petitioner:
Christopher S. Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Janson
as 8:2023cv01046
Petitioner:
Danny Mark Williams
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv00990
Petitioner:
Comest Sabatino Allen
Respondent:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flentall v. Warden William L. Woods
as 8:2023cv00855
Petitioner:
Emilio Flentall
Respondent:
Warden William L. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Long v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
William V. Long and William Von Long
Respondent:
Warden Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
