Cases 11 - 20 of 4,367
Allen v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03724
Petitioner:
William Andrew Allen
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harssema v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Harssema
Respondent:
Bryan Williams and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luevano v. Burns et al
as 3:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Jaime Luecaro and Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
WILLIAM BURNS, Governor Greg Abbott and Secures Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wise v. G. Rosalez
as 1:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
William James Wise
Respondent:
G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02669
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Brown
as 4:2023cv02459
Petitioner:
Anthony Gregg Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
William Thomas Edwards
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Hillhouse
as 6:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Jay Williams
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Brigette D Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
