Cases 11 - 20 of 60
YOUNG v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00682
Petitioner:
BOBBY YOUNG
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. GARMAN et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Petitioner:
VICTOR YOUNG
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv02447
Petitioner:
Reginald Young, Jr.
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. CLARK et al
as 5:2016cv06406
Petitioner:
WILLIE MACK YOUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER COUNTY and TEH ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ODOM v. YOUNGE
as 2:2016cv03861
Petitioner:
ROBERT ODOM
Respondent:
D L YOUNGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv00320
Petitioner:
ANDRE D. YOUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEE-JU v. ORTIZ
as 2:2015cv05010
Petitioner:
YOUNG-HEE JU
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2015cv01830
Petitioner:
ROBERT YOUNG
Respondent:
DIGUGLIELMO , SCI-GRATERFORD and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUNG v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2014cv01078
Petitioner:
RICHARD G. YOUNG, JR.
Respondent:
GILMORE, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI/ROCKVIEW
as 2:2014cv02901
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT AT SCI/ROCKVIEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
