Cases 11 - 20 of 2,764
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dahir v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv01304
Petitioner:
Mohammed Abdi Dahir
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shortymacknifisent v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01280
Petitioner:
Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacknifisent
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, William Bolin and Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Andrew Glover
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becerra v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Erik Becerra
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01034
Petitioner:
Zantra Williams
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berry et al v. Walz et al
as 0:2024cv00962
Petitioner:
Cederic Lamont Berry and Cedric Lamont Berry
Respondent:
Tim Walz and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horswell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv00949
Petitioner:
Phillip Harold Horswell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lohmeier v. Eishen
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Petitioner:
John H. Lohmeier
Respondent:
B. Eishen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
