General Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Johnson v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv10524
Petitioner: Enoh A. Johnson
Respondent: Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and Bruce E. Chadbourne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fort v. Grant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv11804
Petitioner: Lee E. Fort
Respondent: Michael G. Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prall v. Cambridge District Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv10961
Plaintiff: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant: Cambridge District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams, Sr. v. Clarke
as 1:2009cv10425
Plaintiff: Robert E. Williams, Sr.
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Clarke
as 1:2009cv10419
Petitioner: Robert E. Williams
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monteiro v. Commissioner of Corrections
as 1:2009cv10387
Petitioner: Robert E. Monteiro
Respondent: Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reese-Thomas v. Sabol
as 4:2009cv40050
Petitioner: Christopher E. Reese-Thomas
Respondent: Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowlkes v. Dickhaut
as 1:2008cv11638
Plaintiff: Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Respondent: Thomas E. Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dunbar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2008cv40031
Petitioner: Bruce E. Dunbar
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Dickhaut We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv10178
Petitioner: Victor E. Smith
Respondent: Thomas Dickhaut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?