Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Graham v. State Attorney General et al
as 6:2012cv02699
Petitioner:
Robert Graham, Jr.
Respondent:
State Attorney General and Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Attorney General for South Carolina et al
as 2:2011cv02736
Petitioner:
Charles Jordan
Respondent:
Attorney General for South Carolina, Dept of Mental Health and State, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Pate et al
as 3:2011cv01353
Petitioner:
Cedric Woods
Respondent:
John Pate and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baird v. Chapman et al
as 1:2011cv01217
Petitioner:
Randolph Stephen Baird
Respondent:
Aril Chapman and Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2011cv00021
Petitioner:
Patrick R Harrison
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, Homeland Security, Department of, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burston v. McGinley et al
as 6:2010cv02692
Petitioner:
Curtis Burston, Jr.
Respondent:
John C McGinley and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinion v. Owen et al
as 1:2010cv01738
Petitioner:
Armon Lewis Pinion
Respondent:
John Owen and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Owen et al
as 0:2010cv01147
Petitioner:
Milton Joseph Taylor
Respondent:
John Owen, US Parole Commission and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. USA et al
as 8:2010cv00892
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
USA, President of the United States of America, Governor of the State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 2:2010cv00558
Petitioner:
Lenford Williams, Jr
Respondent:
Linda Sanders and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
