Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Liviz v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2019cv11289
Respondent:
Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Ilya Liviz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morin v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv30043
Petitioner:
Jeremy Morin
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liviz Sr. v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv10393
Defendant:
Honorable Justice Scott L. Kafker, Honorable Justice Frank M. Gaziano, Honoralbe Justice Elspeth B. Cypher and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr. and Baby Jurist Ilyan Liviz Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fox v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv10095
Petitioner:
Aaron M Fox
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fox v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv10095
Petitioner:
Aaron M Fox
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Piantedosi v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2018cv12500
Petitioner:
Christopher Piantedosi
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tavares v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2018cv11979
Respondent:
Sheriff James Cumming and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Daniel Domingo Tavares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2018cv10641
Petitioner:
Joshua Lewis
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Enwonwu v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2018cv10517
Petitioner:
Francis Enwonwu
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andujar v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2018cv10220
Petitioner:
George Andujar
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
