Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Chaudhry v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00546
Petitioner:
Ravindra Pal Chaudhry
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Monyamane v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00504
Petitioner:
Thebe Eric Monyamane
Respondent:
Philip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Habbas v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00511
Petitioner:
Walid Habbas
Respondent:
Philip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fernandes v. Crawford et al
as 2:2007cv00365
Petitioner:
Georgina Fernandes
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford, Robert J. Okin, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sine v. Stolc et al
as 2:2007cv00343
Petitioner:
Conrad Fumbo Sine
Respondent:
Bruno Stolc, Phillip Crawford and Christine Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vailolo v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00309
Petitioner:
Mafua Heuaha Vailolo
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raghunath v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00282
Petitioner:
Dasarathi Raghunath
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Singh v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00283
Petitioner:
Gujret Singh
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Herrera v. Crawford
as 2:2007cv00267
Petitioner:
Eduardo Martinez-Herrera
Respondent:
Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Truong v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ky Ngoc Truong
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Phillip Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
