Cases 21 - 28 of 28
LIZAMA GUTIERREZ v. Hott
as 1:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
RODRIGO LIZAMA GUTIERREZ, Enrique Palomares Reyes, Victor Quintanilla Gallegos and others
Respondent:
Russell Hott, Chad F Wolf, Matthew T Albence and others
Rojas v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv00834
Respondent:
Jeffrey Crawford, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Luis Casola Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juste et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2016cv00880
Petitioner:
Andre Juste and Martinez
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (ICE) and Immigration Customs Enforcement (Agents)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Naghman v. USDHS/Immigration Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2015cv00689
Petitioner:
Rafiq Naghman
Respondent:
USDHS/Immigration Customs Enforcement, M. Yvonne Evans and Richard Cropp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abreu v. Decker et al
as 1:2009cv00789
Petitioner:
Joao Albino de Souza Abreu
Respondent:
Thomas Decker and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nasrallah v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement "ICE"
as 3:2008cv00684
Petitioner:
Hussein Nasrallah
Respondent:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement "ICE"
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Singh v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2008cv01087
Petitioner:
Sukhbir Singh and Sukhbir Singh
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael B. Mukasey, Mary F. Loiselle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bokel v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2008cv01000
Petitioner:
Weily Bokel
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Detention and Removal Operations
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
