Cases 21 - 30 of 172
John Demos, Jr. v. Virginia Company, et al
as 22-35795
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
VIRGINIA COMPANY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Demos v. State of Washington
as 1:2022cv03128
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 22-35746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY R. INSLEE, Governor of the State of Washington, CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary Dept. of Corrections and ROB M. JACKSON, Superintendent - Washington State Pentientiary
John Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington
as 22-35678
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
John Demos, Jr. v. Washington State Supreme Court
as 22-35622
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT
John Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington
as 22-35620
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Virginia Company et al
as 2:2022cv01069
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Virginia Company, United States of America and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 22-35589
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2022cv01038
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. United States District Court
as 22-35565
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Tacoma, Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
