Cases 21 - 30 of 31
HOLCOMB v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv05776
Petitioner:
HAROLD HOLCOMB
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YENDELL v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner:
RALPH LEE YENDELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CRAWFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pugh v. Overmyer et al
as 3:2015cv00727
Petitioner:
Douglas B. Pugh
Respondent:
Michael D. Overmyer and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pugh v. Overmyer et al
as 3:2015cv00364
Petitioner:
Douglas B Pugh
Respondent:
Michael D Overmyer and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRACE v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00175
Petitioner:
FRAZIER CISCO GRACE
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUNDY v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00214
Petitioner:
ANTONIO BUNDY
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2014cv00252
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, WILLIE COLE and A. KOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2014cv01252
Petitioner:
SCOTT CLARK
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2014cv04615
Petitioner:
KENDALL HARRIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BERNARD v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BERNARD
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
