Cases 21 - 30 of 87
O'CONNOR v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01651
Petitioner:
KENNETH O'CONNOR
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLICK v. GIROUX et al
as 3:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
JASON RAY FLICK
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00400
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE T. WHITE
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TARPLEY v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00345
Petitioner:
VICTOR TARPLEY
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUDOLPH v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01293
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RUDOLPH
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vazquez v. Giroux et al
as 1:2015cv00350
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Vazquez
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNYDERS v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00521
Petitioner:
RIJAN S. SNYDERS
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MADDREY v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv00487
Petitioner:
DENNIS MADDREY
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEGOG v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv01701
Petitioner:
JOSEPH SHEGOG
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HATCHER v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv07025
Petitioner:
JAMAL HATCHER
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
