Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Ramirez v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2015cv00905
Petitioner:
Juan Irineo Ramirez
Respondent:
Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Ryan
as 2:2015cv00755
Petitioner:
Carmen Sonia Ramirez Martinez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2015cv00576
Petitioner:
Juan Irineo Ramirez
Respondent:
Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Gonzalez v. Winn
as 4:2015cv00020
Petitioner:
Jorge Ramirez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Louis Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00196
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Cesar Ramirez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Ramos #225324 v. Ryan et al
as 3:2013cv08288
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Felix Ufrano Ramirez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez #044638 v. Credio et al
as 2:2013cv02211
Respondent:
Ron Credio, Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ortiz Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv00685
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Arizona, State of and Arizona Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramirez-Garcia v. ICE Homeland Security et al
as 2:2007cv01919
Petitioner:
Romeo Ramirez-Garcia
Respondent:
ICE Homeland Security and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez-Garcia v. Keisler et al
as 2:2007cv01902
Petitioner:
Romeo Ramirez-Garcia
Respondent:
Peter Keisler and Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
