Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Wilkinson v. Dooley et al
as 4:2016cv04049
Petitioner:
Tod Allen Wilkinson
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kim Wade Dillon v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 16-1657
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent - Appellee:
Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, Dennis Kaemingk, Secretary of Corrections, Robert Dooley, Chief Warden of SDDOC and others
Litschewski v. Dooley et al
as 1:2016cv01015
Petitioner:
Richard Virgil Litschewski
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Litschewski v. Dooley et al
as 1:2016cv01009
Petitioner:
Richard Litschewski
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Landman v. Dooley et al
as 5:2015cv05091
Petitioner:
Burton Kenneth Landman
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Dooley
as 4:2015cv04194
Petitioner:
O'Dell K. Johnson
Respondent:
Robert Dooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bauer v. Dooley
as 5:2015cv05089
Petitioner:
Jeremy Bauer
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shawn Springer v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-3701
Petitioner - Appellant:
Shawn Cameron Springer
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Warden and Marty Jackley, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Mark Anthony Feiock v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-3396
Petitioner - Appellant:
Mark Anthony Feiock
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley, Warden and Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Clayton Creek v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-3274
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
