Cases 21 - 30 of 357
Scott v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00859
Petitioner:
Joseph Pastquinel Scott
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Collier
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pastquinel Scott
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00836
Petitioner:
Phillip (Baby Shark) Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00781
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Reynolds
as 5:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Phillip G. Scott
Respondent:
Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Britt
as 3:2022cv01163
Petitioner:
Nathan Javon Scott
Respondent:
Michael Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Scott v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00433
Petitioner:
Michael Scott
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00342
Petitioner:
William Scott Garrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holcomb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01239
Petitioner:
David Scott Holcomb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wheelock v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv00310
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
TDCJ Director(Submit for Session) and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
