Cases 21 - 30 of 650
Jeremy Koons v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15517
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY LEE KOONS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, named as The Attorney General of the State of: Arizona
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Wade Limehouse v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15390
Petitioner / Appellant:
WADE AARON LIMEHOUSE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael McKerlie v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15332
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCKERLIE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jeffrey Bucholtz v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15305
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFFREY GLENN BUCHOLTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jordan Billups v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15301
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORDAN DONALD BILLUPS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jay Thomas v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15194
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAY CAMERON THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael Cook v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15185
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL LYNN COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Anderson #089965 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00230
Petitioner:
Brian Lyle Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke #060858 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08028
Petitioner:
Brent Fitzgerald Duke
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
