Cases 21 - 30 of 4,262
Dimas v. Warner
as 1:2024cv03044
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ochoa Dimas
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mezquita Vega v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv00605
Petitioner:
Sonia L Mezquita Vega
Respondent:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowe v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv05196
Petitioner:
Anthony C Rowe
Respondent:
Jack Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05332
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Serrano v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05259
Petitioner:
Ramil A Serrano
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05223
Petitioner:
Dennis McDaniel
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ingmire-Lopez v. Whatcom County Jail
as 2:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
Darrell Lee Ingmire-Lopez
Respondent:
Whatcom County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hart v. Department of Corrections Washington State
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Joseph William Hart
Respondent:
Department of Corrections Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
