Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Jordan v. Arpaio
as 2:2014cv00152
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio
Petitioner:
Cedric Ross Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02304
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv01808
Petitioner:
Samuel Louis Fuller
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Jordyn R Raimondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv01117
Petitioner:
Samuel Louis Fuller
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv00654
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Samuel Louis Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Spencer et al
as 2:2012cv02292
Petitioner:
Stanley Hall
Respondent:
Barbera L Spencer, Mitchel Wienstien, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bektashi v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv02129
Petitioner:
David Edward Bektashi
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Jail and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casteel #106031 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01903
Petitioner:
Everett Gregory Casteel
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salman v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv01747
Petitioner:
Michael Hashem Salman
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Copeland v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2012cv01389
Petitioner:
Naeem Copeland
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
