General Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Odom #228931 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01199
Petitioner: Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Respondent: Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00990
Petitioner: Stephen Lamarr Hall
Respondent: Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Biglow v. Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2018cv11877
Petitioner: Quran Biglow
Respondent: Director, Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Riggins v. Michigan Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv10715
Petitioner: Robert Riggins
Respondent: Michigan Department of Corrections
Barnes #160068 v. Michigan Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00265
Petitioner: Lee A. Barnes #160068
Respondent: Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv10569
Petitioner: Peter Taylor
Respondent: Michigan Department of Corrections
Morton v. Michigan, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv14074
Petitioner: William M. Morton
Respondent: Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan Parole Board
Smith et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 5:2016cv13775
Plaintiff: Derrick Lee Smith, William T. Preston, Kathy Preston and others
Defendant: Michigan Department of Corrections
Ashondo Hill v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2076
Petitioner - Appellant: ASHONDO KARICE HILL
Respondent - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DANIEL H. HEYNS, named as Daniel Heynes (Director)
Derrick Smith v. MDOC
as 16-1788
Petitioner - Appellant: DERRICK LEE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Hearings Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?