General Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Perez v. Bledsoe et al
as 1:2012cv00222
Petitioner: Daniel Perez
Respondent: B. A. Bledsoe, Hudson, Jane/John #1 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Ebbert
as 1:2011cv00641
Petitioner: Jose Perez
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gutierrez-Perez v. The United States Of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02184
Petitioner: Gerardo Gutierrez-Perez
Respondent: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Rodriguez v. Holt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01312
Petitioner: Jose A Perez-Rodriguez
Respondent: Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIRALDO-PEREZ v. ZENK
as 3:2009cv00133
Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS GIRALDO-PEREZ
Respondent: MICHAEL ZENK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PEREZ v. QUINTANA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00044
Petitioner: FERNANDO PEREZ
Respondent: FRANCISCO QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PEREZ v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2007cv00305
Petitioner: SAMUEL SANTIAGO PEREZ
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. PATRICK et al
as 3:2007cv00276
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER PEREZ
Respondent: GEORGE PATRICK and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. WYDNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00605
Petitioner: FRANCISCO PEREZ
Respondent: JAMES T. WYDNER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?