Cases 31 - 40 of 708
Mason v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00800
Petitioner:
Malik Mason
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 5:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
Steve O'Neal Green
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00344
Petitioner:
Steve Oneal Green
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
Jerry Don Rhodes
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standingwater v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00237
Petitioner:
Terry Standingwater
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Edward S Downs
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Muskogee County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Vincent H. Small
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wonsch v. Crow
as 22-6040
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT V. WONSCH
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and SCOTT CROW
Harcourt v. Dennis et al
as 5:2022cv00113
Petitioner:
William David Harcourt
Respondent:
Chad Dennis and Attorney General State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
Mario Williams
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Secretary of Interior, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
