Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Bivins v. Werlich
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv00150
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Tevin Bivins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keys v. Werlich
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv00094
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Tyrone Lavon Keys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Werlich
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv00054
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Darnell Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Werlich
as 3:2019cv00034
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Michael Leo Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Werlich
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv02186
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Hakeem L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Reynolds v. T.G. Werlich
as 18-2498
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. REYNOLDS
Respondent - Appellee:
T.G. WERLICH, Warden
Shannon Cotton v. T.G. Werlich
as 17-3567
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON L. COTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
T.G. WERLICH, Warden
Thomas Vitrano v. T.G. Werlich
as 17-3121
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS P. VITRANO
Respondent - Appellee:
T.G. WERLICH, Warden
Hagi Scott v. T.G. Werlich
as 17-1884
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAGI SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
T.G. WERLICH, Warden
Donavan v. Werlich et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 0:2017cv01144
Petitioner:
Joshua R Donavan
Respondent:
T.G. Werlich and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.