Cases 31 - 40 of 183
Parsons v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Parsons
Respondent:
The United States of America and The State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01011
Petitioner:
Santiago M. Shaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02732
Petitioner:
Calvin James Reid
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braden v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00818
Plaintiff:
Charles Braden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sonsteng v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02668
Petitioner:
Vernon Sonsteng
Respondent:
United States of America and A W Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marion v. Warden FCI Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02578
Petitioner:
Anthony Domontay Marion
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riales v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01125
Petitioner:
William David Riales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. Warden FCI Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02497
Petitioner:
Demontez Jadon Anderson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Memphis and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
