Cases 31 - 40 of 203
Underwood v. Ducey et al
as 4:2021cv00016
Respondent:
Doug Ducey, David Shinn, Arizona, State of and others
Petitioner:
Abdul Mahaddie Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKerlie #303744 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00511
Petitioner:
Michael William McKerlie
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson #071262 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2020cv02189
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Petitioner:
William G Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. Pima County Superior Court
as 4:2020cv00486
In Re:
In the Matter of U.S. Currency in the Amount of $119,805.00 Seized in PCSO Case No. 111111227
Petitioner:
William Harold Wright, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bodney #130538 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00373
Respondent:
David Shinn, Arizona Attorney General and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
William Lamonte Bodney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stedcke v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00346
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
William R Stedcke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 4:2020cv00334
Petitioner:
John Luther Williams
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Welch v. Mascher et al
as 3:2020cv08184
Respondent:
Joshua Fisher, Scott Mascher and John Napper
Petitioner:
Ryan William Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Neufeld #323620 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08155
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Petitioner:
Cole William Neufeld
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Welch v. Mascher et al
as 3:2020cv08142
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Josh Fisher, Scott Mascher and others
Petitioner:
Ryan William Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
