Cases 31 - 40 of 6,957
Garner v. Gutierrez
as 4:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Steve J Garner
Respondent:
M Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gibson v. Arizona, State of
as 4:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
JuJuan Marquette Gibson
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Scott v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonio v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08037
Petitioner:
Jack Donald Antonio
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruce-Pino v. Homeland Security Department Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 2:2024cv00751
Petitioner:
Juan David Bruce-Pino
Respondent:
Homeland Security Department Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chavez v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Adam Abel Chavez
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palmer #329648 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Lemuel Harold Palmer, V
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens #137961 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
William Ivy Pickens, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lapan v. Thornell
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
James R Lapan
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munkus v. Gutierrez
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
James Dewayne Munkus
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
