Cases 31 - 40 of 7,234
Poon v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00752
Petitioner:
Susan H. Poon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. The People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03167
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
The People of the State of Illinois and Cook County States Attorney's Office Criminal Prosecutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00793
Petitioner:
Charles Carson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50145
Petitioner:
Lee Bonner
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Wills
as 3:2024cv00467
Petitioner:
Edward S. Phillips
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Hills and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01275
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Cochran
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
