General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00688
Petitioner: Billy Jackson
Respondent: Superintendent
Miscellaneous_party: WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv00227
Petitioner: RODNEY LAWRENCE JACKSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, TERRE HAUTE, FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00277
Petitioner: Keith Jackson
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Marberry
as 3:2013cv00172
Petitioner: Demetrius Jackson
Respondent: Marberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00604
Petitioner: Nathaniel C W Jackson
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00605
Petitioner: Nathaniel C W Jackson
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00515
Petitioner: Charles E Jackson
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv00243
Petitioner: BRUCE JACKSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SMITH
as 1:2011cv01094
Petitioner: TIMOTHY L. JACKSON
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Superintendent
as 2:2011cv00286
Petitioner: Allen K Jackson
Defendant: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?