Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Kirk v. Inslee et al
as 2:2014cv00566
Petitioner:
John Lloyd Kirk
Respondent:
Jay Inslee, Bernard Warner, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulton v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv00217
Petitioner:
Gina Kay Fulton
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fulton v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2012cv00189
Petitioner:
Gina Kay Fulton
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howard v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00462
Petitioner:
Christopher Brady Howard
Respondent:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Timothy Norman Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibsen v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv05987
Petitioner:
Tony Allen Ibsen
Respondent:
Washington Department of Corrections and Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berry v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2011cv01852
Petitioner:
Keith D. Berry
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howard v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv05791
Petitioner:
Christopher Brady Howard
Respondent:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Timothy Norman Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Krafp v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2011cv05692
Petitioner:
Steven Christopher Krafp
Respondent:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cason v. Frakes et al
as 2:2011cv01412
Petitioner:
James Artis Cason
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and State of Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Elliott v. Vail et al
as 3:2011cv05377
Petitioner:
Brian Howard Elliott
Respondent:
Eldon Vail and Washington State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
