Cases 41 - 50 of 237
Lemke v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv01059
Petitioner:
Robert D Lemke
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Nordstrom v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15995
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT D. NORDSTROM
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of Arizona Dept. of Corrections, C. TOERSBIJNS, Deputy Warden Eyman Complex and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
William Furlong, Jr. v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15960
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. FURLONG, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, AZ DOC and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Mark Lawrence v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 09-15929
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK RYAN LAWRENCE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and DORA B. SCHRIRO
James Fox v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15834
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EARL FOX
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jeffrey Faulkner v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15824
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY JAMES FAULKNER
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wassenaar v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00854
Petitioner:
Ricky Kurt Wassenaar
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Gonzales v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15775
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, EDWARD BARTOS and RANDALL M. HOWE
Donnell Thomas v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15705
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Ernie Ortega v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15680
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERNIE PETE ORTEGA
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Warden and ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
