Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Francis v. Fabian
as 0:2008cv00836
Petitioner:
Michael Calvin Francis
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Fabian
as 0:2008cv00769
Petitioner:
Antonio Darrail Burton
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Battle-Bey v. Dingle et al
as 0:2008cv00313
Petitioner:
Darwin Ray Battle-Bey
Respondent:
Lynn Dingle, Lynn Dingle, Joan Fabian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turnage v. Fabian
as 0:2008cv00210
Petitioner:
Quanartis Turnage
Respondent:
Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Fabian et al
as 0:2008cv00022
Petitioner:
Lennell M. Martin
Respondent:
Joan Fabian, Joan Fabian, Robert Fanies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shannon v. Fabian et al
as 0:2007cv04931
Plaintiff:
Darren Don Shannon
Defendant:
Joan Fabian, Erik Skon, Lynn Dingle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulberg v. Fabian
as 0:2007cv04794
Petitioner:
Scott Brandon Schulberg
Respondent:
Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medal-Mendoza v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2007cv04591
Petitioner:
Michael R. Medal-Mendoza
Respondent:
Minnesota, State of, Minnesota, State of, Joan Fabian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fabian
as 0:2007cv04466
Petitioner:
Phillip N. Jones
Respondent:
Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wren v. Fabian
as 0:2007cv04353
Petitioner:
James Clinton Wren
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and Joan Fabian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
