Cases 41 - 50 of 120
BURNETT v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00543
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
DARYL K. BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv04213
Miscellaneou:
CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL - CIC (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
JEFFREY K. JOHNSON
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KORNHARDT v. WARDEN
as 2:2017cv00310
Petitioner:
JAMES K. KORNHARDT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KONRATH v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01411
Respondent:
K. BUTTS
Petitioner:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv01291
Petitioner:
ERIC DONNELL HOLMES
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and K. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPRUNGER v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00111
Respondent:
BRIAN K. SMITH
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS SPRUNGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lashbrook v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00184
Petitioner:
Daniel K Lashbrook
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AVERITTE v. BUGHER et al
as 1:2016cv03502
Petitioner:
DERRICK AVERITTE
Respondent:
ROBERT BUGHER, K. HARTZELL, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARR v. NOBLE et al
as 3:2016cv00233
Respondent:
KATHEY ALVEY, N. HUFF, K. KERMAL and others
Petitioner:
DAVID H. CARR
FRA:
ROBERT D. RUGHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chenoweth v. Neal
as 3:2016cv00673
Petitioner:
James K Chenoweth
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
