Cases 41 - 50 of 55
King v. Martinez
as 3:2009cv00710
Petitioner:
Raymond King
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
King v. Kerestes
as 3:2009cv00694
Petitioner:
Gregory King
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KING v. YOST
as 2:2009cv00406
Petitioner:
GARLAND W. KING
Respondent:
JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KING v. YOST
as 2:2008cv01427
Petitioner:
GARLAND W. KING
Respondent:
JOHN YOST
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WARREN v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2008cv03295
Petitioner:
DANIEL KING WARREN, JR.
Respondent:
JAMES B. MARTIN, ANDREA E. NAUGLE and CHRISTIE F. BONESCH
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ADONAI-ADONI v. DR. CAULK et al
as 2:2008cv00087
Petitioner:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Respondent:
DR. CAULK, PHS - PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, P.P.S. - PHILA. PRISON SYSTEMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
King v. Palakovich
as 3:2007cv02327
Petitioner:
John King
Respondent:
John Palakovich and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2007cv02243
Petitioner:
Andrew Michael King
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Mr. Ronnie R. Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ADONAI-ADONI v. AMBRO et al
as 2:2007cv05216
Petitioner:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Respondent:
THOMAS AMBRO, LOUIS POLLAK, LINDA CARACAPPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JEFFERIES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv04205
Petitioner:
GREGORY JEFFERIES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LEON KING, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
