Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Bartels #336354 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Petitioner:
Caleb Bartels
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
William Michael Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burgess v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08050
Petitioner:
Burien Jarrett Burgess and Buren Jarrett Burgess
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Head v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08048
Petitioner:
Daniel Newton Head
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris #113830 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
David C Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lizardi v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Petitioner:
Roberto Lizardi, Jr
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglass v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
Jeremy Douglass
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devin Andrich v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 22-15141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CIMINO, ALLISTER ADEL, Maricopa County Attorney and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Speers #168327 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
Phillip Gregory Speers
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00170
Petitioner:
Michael Blas Rivera
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
