Cases 41 - 50 of 165
Scott Nordstrom v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15995
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT D. NORDSTROM
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of Arizona Dept. of Corrections, C. TOERSBIJNS, Deputy Warden Eyman Complex and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Leonard Guzman v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15978
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARD GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO, TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and CHARLES L. RYAN
William Furlong, Jr. v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15960
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM F. FURLONG, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director, AZ DOC and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Fragoso v. Riening et al
as 4:2009cv00239
Petitioner:
Alfonso Fragoso
Respondent:
Charles Riening and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Cavazos v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15752
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAM PETE CAVAZOS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO and TERRY GODDARD, State of Arizona Attorney General
Donnell Thomas v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15705
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Schwartz v. Ryan et al
as 4:2009cv00200
Petitioner:
Bradley Schwartz
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Donnell Thomas v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-15643
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONNELL THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO and TERRY GODDARD, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Dawson v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00468
Petitioner:
Charles Ladell Dawson
Respondent:
Dora Schriro and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Soto v. Schriro et al
as 2:2009cv00326
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Soto
Respondent:
Dora Schriro, Terry Goddard and Arizona Atorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
