Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Smith v. United States
as 3:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Carlton Victor Smith
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Edwards v. Shelby County Corrections Warden et al
as 1:2022cv01064
Petitioner:
Stacy Edwards
Defendant:
Shelby County Corrections Warden, United States District Court, U.S. Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrihim v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Petitioner:
Siraj Ibrihim and Robert Crain
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winder v. United States Marshals (BOP)
as 2:2022cv02102
Petitioner:
Aaron Winder
Respondent:
United States Marshals (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01011
Petitioner:
Santiago M. Shaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reid v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02732
Petitioner:
Calvin James Reid
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braden v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00818
Plaintiff:
Charles Braden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brooks v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2021cv02679
Petitioner:
Unique Brooks
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sonsteng v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02668
Petitioner:
Vernon Sonsteng
Respondent:
United States of America and A W Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
