Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Navarro-Gutierrez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv01577
Petitioner:
Alfredo Navarro-Gutierrez
Respondent:
United States of America and Natalie Asher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv05079
Petitioner:
Victor Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv01119
Petitioner:
Victor Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soriano-Maclin v. Asher et al
as 2:2014cv00209
Respondent:
Nathalie R Asher , Lowell Clark , Juan P Osuna and others
Petitioner:
Abel Soriano-Maclin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Descamps v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00424
Petitioner:
Matthew Robert Descamps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Descamps v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00341
Petitioner:
Matthew Robert Descamps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kalebu v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv01611
Petitioner:
Joshua Muwanga Kalebu
Respondent:
United States of America and Natalie Asher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. President of the United States of America, et al
as 2:2013cv00147
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
President of the United States of America and US Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neri-Vega v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00038
Petitioner:
Juan Martin Neri-Vega
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perales v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2012cv00432
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
