Cases 41 - 50 of 55,815
Audley G. Evans v. The United States of America
as 5:2024cv00959
Petitioner:
Audley G. Evans, II
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC)Ramirez v. Scholyer
as 1:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Peter Torres Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles Scholyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. J. Engleman
as 2:2024cv02064
Petitioner:
Phillip Camillo-Amisano
Respondent:
Warden J. Engleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Briggs v. Schuyler
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Briggs
Respondent:
C Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Dunston v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv03574
Petitioner:
Kevin Dunston
Respondent:
State of California, The County of Los Angeles, Pasadena Superior Ct. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abel Josue Garcia v. The People
as 2:2024cv03624
Petitioner:
Abel Josue Garcia
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Manuel Orona v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Manuel Orona
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Rile v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Respondent:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
