Cases 41 - 50 of 2,764
Wren v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
James David Wren
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Del Real v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Miguel Eduardo Del Real
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Matthew Hernandez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spottswood v. State of Minneostota et al
as 0:2023cv03815
Petitioner:
Shawn Clarke Spottswood
Respondent:
State of Minneostota and Washington County 10th Judicial District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Raymond Joseph Traylor, Sr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luque v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 0:2023cv03893
Petitioner:
Lauren Courtney Lugue and Lauren Courtney Luque
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prison and Federal Correctional Institution Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Steenhard v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03844
Petitioner:
James Dean Steenhard
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heil v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03845
Petitioner:
Tanner Jon Heil
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heil v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03843
Petitioner:
Tanner Jon Heil
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
William Demont White, Jr.
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
