Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Francois v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv00717
Petitioner:
Kevin Lee Francois
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faulkner v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv00406
Petitioner:
Gary Faulkner
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv00379
Petitioner:
Jamonz Majerrious Ross
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Organ v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv00158
Petitioner:
Daniel Roy Organ
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Margaret Callaway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Welty et al
as 2:2011cv00151
Petitioner:
Russell Anderson
Respondent:
Joseph C Welty, Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrada-Pastrano v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2011cv00005
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Joseph M Arpaio
Petitioner:
Gerardo Edmundo Andrada-Pastrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02800
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ramone Mathis
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02741
Petitioner:
Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02730
Petitioner:
Diago Deles Nelson
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Rick Romley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holden v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02725
Petitioner:
Wybra Christopher Holden
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
