Cases 51 - 60 of 156
Baker #116698 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2013cv00294
Petitioner:
Andrew Burton Baker #116698
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson Sumpter v. Mary Berghuis, et al
as 13-1434
Petitioner - Appellant:
NELSON SUMPTER
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY BERGHUIS, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARMEN PALMER, Warden
Louis Akrawi v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 12-2379
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS AKRAWI
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Akrawi v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2012cv13977
Petitioner:
Louis Akrawi
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board and Michigan Department of Corrections
Larry Harrison, Jr. v. Gregory Forest
as 12-2019
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY TARONE HARRISON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GREGORY FOREST, Probation Agent, Michigan Department of Corrections
Fox v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00222
Petitioner:
Ronald L. Fox
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Michigan Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith #261933 v. Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board et al
as 1:2012cv00515
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith #261933
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections Parole Board and Willie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv12141
Petitioner:
Andre Green
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Genesee County Circuit Court
Paul Deering v. MDOC
as 12-1423
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL HOWARD DEERING
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Mayes v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv11344
Plaintiff:
Iyan Mayes
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Southern Regional Health Care Services, Macomb Correctional Facilities Health Care Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
