Cases 51 - 60 of 41,961
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01231
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01254
Petitioner:
Tiuan J Moore
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nadeau v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ryan Nadeau
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Fletcher
as 6:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Enrique A. Diaz
Respondent:
Sheriff Brandon Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Richard Louis Flores
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Other:
Gregory M Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boswell v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01255
Petitioner:
Avery S Boswell
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas- Tyler.
as 4:2024cv01950
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00213
Petitioner:
Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent and Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
