Cases 61 - 70 of 174
Collins v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00338
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Thunder Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Hansen et al
as 8:2018cv00332
Respondent:
Brad Hansen, Scott Frakes and Department of Correctional Services
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Richard K. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scaggs v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01784
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, Cynthia Coffman and Matthew Hansen
Petitioner:
Quent Scaggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Hansen
as 4:2018cv03094
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Petitioner:
Dave Harrison
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Epp v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00323
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Petitioner:
William Epp
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fletcher v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00275
Petitioner:
Barry W. Fletcher
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv01524
Petitioner:
Gerome Brooks
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch, Cynthia Coffman and Matthew Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garza v. Hansen
as 8:2018cv00276
Petitioner:
Robert Garza
Respondent:
Brad Hansen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trimble, Jr. v. Hansen et al
as 1:2018cv01336
Petitioner:
Willie J. Trimble, Jr.
Respondent:
Mathew Hansen and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Custer v. Frakes et al
as 8:2018cv00224
Petitioner:
Jason William Custer
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and Brad Hansen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
