Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Smith v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02707
Petitioner:
Antwon Duran Smith
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio, Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Villagrana v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02639
Petitioner:
Carlos R Villagrana
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhone v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02620
Petitioner:
Jeffery Craig Rhone
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricci v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02618
Petitioner:
Travis Ricci
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holden v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02565
Petitioner:
Wybra Christopher Holden
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinkins v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02567
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Pinkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilder v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02492
Petitioner:
Shon Anthony Wilder
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oswald v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02436
Petitioner:
Martin Edward Oswald
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nash v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02451
Petitioner:
Levi Leon Nash
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conway v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2010cv02439
Petitioner:
Stephen Scott Conway
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
