Cases 61 - 70 of 184
ENGLISH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06480
Petitioner:
JAMES F. ENGLISH, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SETH R. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KURTZ v. ALTOONA PA POLICE et al
as 3:2016cv00236
Petitioner:
ROBERT F. KURTZ
Respondent:
ALTOONA PA POLICE and BLAIR COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPENCE v. RENN et al
as 2:2016cv05710
Petitioner:
LEVAR LEE ANTHONY SPENCE
Respondent:
RICHARD K. RENN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE , SETH F. BORTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schubert v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv02198
Petitioner:
Karl F. Schubert
Respondent:
Barry Smith, Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania and Charles J. Volkert, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Warden, FCI Allenwood Low
as 1:2016cv00910
Petitioner:
John F. Jackson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRABSON v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01501
Petitioner:
WAYNE F. BRABSON
Respondent:
GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA IN HARRISBURG PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKnight v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2015cv02099
Petitioner:
William F McKnight
Respondent:
J. Kerestes and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOLDSMIT v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2015cv05607
Petitioner:
HARRY WOLDSMIT
Respondent:
VINCENT F. MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VANDO v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv01309
Petitioner:
LEN VANDO
Respondent:
LOUIS F. FOLINO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GILL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv01215
Petitioner:
DWIGHT F. GILL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
