Cases 61 - 70 of 2,115
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer, Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sydnor v. Weber
as 1:2023cv02521
Petitioner:
Davonne Sydnor
Respondent:
Ronald Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Davon D. Gray
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv02642
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Moss
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singfield v. Warden
as 1:2023cv02052
Petitioner:
Harold Malcolm Singfield
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardrick v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv02014
Petitioner:
Robert Wardrick
Respondent:
Warden, State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houck v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Petitioner:
James E. Houck
Respondent:
Warden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Donald Khan
Respondent:
Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raynor v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv01748
Petitioner:
Glenn Joseph Raynor
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shakelabassi v. Werner
as 1:2023cv01670
Petitioner:
Mohammad Shakeelabbasi
Respondent:
Gregory Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
